Closed azaroth42 closed 8 years ago
I think we called it a Part, but acknowledged that it was contextual. So it was just an Object that was the member of some other Object, and in that context was considered a Part.
So no new subClass? That's fine by me :) We should discuss discoverability (in a separate issue, perhaps not even modeling related).
Others okay to close?
:+1: to closing.
:rocket:
:ok:
Closing -- no new subclass :)
At LDCX, I believe that we created a subClass of pcdm:Object which was tentatively named ???:Part. Objects hasMember Parts, and Parts (I think) hasMember Parts.
Can Object hasMember Object still, or is everything a Part? Is the use case for Object hasMember Object the discovery one, where a Part should NOT be discovered separately from its Object, whereas an Object that's included can be separately discovered?
With much elision:
(Summoning @jpstroop @escowles @tpendragon @no-reply @mjgiarlo)