Closed mmaelicke closed 1 week ago
We currently discussed the blossom icon in the map. We think, a flower icon next to the trees would not look good. We have two new ideas. But we are not sure, which we prefer:
As we are not sure, how it would look like on the map, we propose the following course of action: Could you @mmaelicke implement the (for you) easier of the two options, so that we could see how it would look? Then we can decide to keep it or try the more complicated option.
OK, just that I get this right:
Then, the first option is the by magnitudes easier to implement, I guess. So, if I got you right, I would go for that one first.
Do blossoms follow a season, like (mar - may), or the flowering data? What should be shown if the flowering is not 'active'? Or should the blossoms data be treated like annual averages and not respond to the mont-slider at all?
No, not completely:
The blossoms follow the flowering data from the "Reduzierte_Arten_allData..." table.
Originally posted by @JesJehle in https://github.com/hydrocode-de/integra-frontend/issues/120#issuecomment-2098228833