codecov[bot]
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
All modified lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
affd172) 90.47% compared to head (4e395ce) 90.47%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #908 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 90.47% 90.47% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 294 294 ======================================= Hits 266 266 Misses 28 28 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This PR updates coverage from 7.3.1 to 7.3.2.
Changelog
### 7.3.2 ``` -------------------------- - The ``coverage lcov`` command ignored the ``[report] exclude_lines`` and ``[report] exclude_also`` settings (`issue 1684`_). This is now fixed, thanks `Jacqueline Lee <pull 1685_>`_. - Sometimes SQLite will create journal files alongside the coverage.py database files. These are ephemeral, but could be mistakenly included when combining data files. Now they are always ignored, fixing `issue 1605`_. Thanks to Brad Smith for suggesting fixes and providing detailed debugging. - On Python 3.12+, we now disable SQLite writing journal files, which should be a little faster. - The new 3.12 soft keyword ``type`` is properly bolded in HTML reports. - Removed the "fullcoverage" feature used by CPython to measure the coverage of early-imported standard library modules. CPython `stopped using it <88054_>`_ in 2021, and it stopped working completely in Python 3.13. .. _issue 1605: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1605 .. _issue 1684: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1684 .. _pull 1685: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1685 .. _88054: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/88054 .. _changes_7-3-1: ```Links
- PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/coverage - Changelog: https://data.safetycli.com/changelogs/coverage/ - Repo: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy