Open roachcord3 opened 3 years ago
Now that I think about it, if #677 is implemented and can do arbitrary kinds of relationships, then I could just make a "decensor" relationship an have tag copying rules for it. So, that use case may be moot depending on whether that one gets implemented in a certain way, at least, for my personal use case.
The "title" relationship I think might be a bit different: obviously you could make a relationship like "paid version," but that's really darn similar in concept to "better quality duplicate," and it's not like the only time the desire to only copy a tag if the better quality duplicate doesn't have tags of that namespace is the "paid version" idea.
Since posting this, I've come up with new use cases. The newer one, which should be relevant to more users, comes first.
Use case 1: only copy
title:
tag if better duplicate doesn't have oneI follow some artists who use both pixiv and a paid site. They tend to post some lower-res versions of their works on pixiv with a link to the high-res versions on their paysite. I consider the post titles for each individual post to be identifiers of that post, so I don't want to copy the
title:
tag over.There are also the cases of artists reposting past work on the same site, but in better quality. This is another time when I don't want to copy the
title:
tag.However, there are times when I have a better quality duplicate from another source that doesn't have titles, such as a private discord server acting as a paysite. In this case, copying the
title:
over usually makes sense, since there isn't the same "post page" concept going on.To solve this, I would like a rule that says "copy
title:
tags from worse to better, unless the better quality image already has anytitle:
tag."Use case 2: only copy
todo:
tag if better duplicate also meets the criteriaI use a tag on the
my tags
service to indicate a backlog of files where I want to do some future work with them: clean them up/decensor in GIMP, search for/purchase a higher resolution version, stuff like that. In some cases, when processing dupes, I want to still copy/move these tags because a new dupe, even if it is higher quality, has not satisfied the workflow yet.Example of when I want to keep a tag: there's a file I plan to decensor later when I have the time. I find a higher resolution version of it online but the higher res is still censored. I want to preserve my tag that tells me to decensor the image later.
Counter example of when I want to remove that same tag: I get around to decensoring the file and I use dupe processing to replace it. In this case I don't want to copy the tag.
To solve this, I would like a rule that says "if the better quality image has the
meta:censored
tag on any service, copy thetodo:decensor
tag from worse to better."This may be partially addressed by #754 but having to create new custom actions for every conditional branch would be very tedious, and it would be easy to get the rules out of sync if e.g. I want to add a new tag to the blacklist in general.