Open CuddleBear92 opened 8 years ago
Re-opening as this issue still stands. Cleaning up comments.
@CuddleBear92 Similarity is not a sortable value because a ~= b
== b ~= a
. Did you mean group by? And if so what is wrong with the duplicates system at present for this?
No, sort. I still stand by my word since 2015. Sort orders by dupe id/group. That way it can more easily be sorted with dupes next to eachother in a normal gallery view.
Its a different usecase than the dupe tab itself.
Well similarity is a metric between two images not a metric on each image that can be used to compare A and B, so you would have to sort on similarity relative to a particular image.
It sounds like what you want is for already duplicate processed groups where it was determined that a king of those groups should be next to its subordinates, and that's fine unless you have a weird edge case where one of its subordinates is also king of a different group, in which case there goes your ordering out the window.
Imagine applying this to things that have no standard sizes like music, videos, or even ebooks... but it can be done with hashes and summarization.
For Books and Texts:
sort by similarity? not sure if this can even be done. would be nice to have a quick way to sort similar images and so on when they don't have a title/issue/page and so on to sort after. yes you can argue that you can sort by filename. but that is only when you actually have a file name to search after, doesnt help that files on boorus doesnt contain filenames either and you cant import folders with the filename namespace either.