Closed kyouko-taiga closed 6 months ago
👍
I guess you're not yet testing locally with an assert-enabled LLVM. We strongly recommend that, y'know ;-)
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.70%. Comparing base (
35e5838
) to head (4e0ad45
). Report is 15 commits behind head on lifetime-enforcement.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@kyouko-taiga Currently it shows ArrayType.count
to be uncovered, but resolving the merge might make that go away.
@kyouko-taiga oh, the base branch is not main
. Don't know whether you realized that.
I think that was intentional, because IIRC the code my additional test is building on that other PR and is an answer to your comment.
Since I closed #55 I will salvage this PR to make it work with the "current" API design.
This PR adds a test exercising the standard optimization passes of LLVM (i.e.,
-O0
,-O1
, ...)