Closed sichen1234 closed 2 years ago
These changes makes sense. For secure-identities, not sure these should go to the fabric directory. While the identity connectors (web-socket, vault) have been configured to integrate with fabric, it could be setup differently, or generalized in the future.
Identity solutions could also be built for other network components, e.g. IPFS, or a key manager/multisig tool for EVM or other public networks where NET is deployed.
That makes sense. We'll leave the secure-identities in its own directory.
This is done now.
I think the current directory structure is getting confusing and propose a refactoring like this:
Question: Should multi-cloud-deployment (for deploying fabric) and secure-identities (for signing fabric transactions as clients) be in the fabric/ directory?