Closed TimoGlastra closed 1 year ago
To clarify -- this is the "self" ID for an object.
The task of doing this in the spec should be a pass made for addressing only this issue should be added to the roadmap.
The task of doing this in the spec should be a pass made for addressing only this issue should be added to the roadmap.
What do you exactly mean with this sentence @swcurran?
That we need a PR that is specific to addressing this issue in the spec. Removing the items from all the documents. This is an attempt to reduce merge conflicts.
At least I think that is what I meant. I wrote that 4 days ago! 🤣
Was that already resolved? I couldn't find the own id
property on the objects but the legend that the identifier is dependent on where the object is published and the AnonCreds method used.
Should be good then. Closing this issue.
As discussed on the AnonCreds implementers call on 2022-11-07, there is no need to add the identifiers to the AnonCreds objects, this is just an external value and a reference to the object.
Discussion: https://github.com/hyperledger/anoncreds-rs/issues/4