Closed TimoGlastra closed 8 months ago
@swcurran for the WG call later today
The minimum change here is that "definition" is to be changed to "id".
However, we still have the issue of whether we want to keep the information there, or move it to into the proof
, and further, if we want to move it into the signature.
Driver is whether we can/should eliminate the @context
for AnonCreds entirely. For that, we would need a strategy for each existing item. The biggest tradeoff seems to be the lack of human visibility to the credential -- and whether or not that matters.
Next step is to summarize into a presentation to facilitate a discuss with Manu et al. from the W3C Data Integrity / VC group.
Resolved as we sorted out the W3C VC formatting.
currently it has
type
,definition
andschema