Closed conanoc closed 3 months ago
ACA-Py is following the did-communication
convention right now. This convention is defined here: https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-rfcs/blob/main/features/0067-didcomm-diddoc-conventions/README.md#service-conventions
ACA-Py is correctly adhering to this convention and has not yet adopted the DIDCommMessaging service type.
Credo, by comparison, is using the DIDCommMessaging service type but using the old did-communication
conventions i.e. the serviceEndpoint is a string when it should be an object with the accept
and routingKeys
fields.
I'm not sure I see how this issue applies to ACA-Py at the moment. Could you elaborate?
I filed this issue to notice that there's a compatibility issue among peer-did libraries as listed here: https://github.com/decentralized-identity/peer-did-method-spec/issues/64
At first, I thought using did-communication
type services in peer-did was not conforming to the spec. Now I have learned that the spec does not specify which type to use. And maybe this is the source of the compatibility issue.
This issue of credo-ts also exists in ACA-Py.