Closed CoreyLin closed 5 years ago
@houqinghui qinghui, could you help? Thanks.
I noticed that even though the benchmark test failed, "marbles" chaincode was actually successfully instantiated in the peer:
So I am curious that why the error log also shows "warn: [e2eUtils.js]: instantiate proposal was bad: Error: REQUEST_TIMEOUT"?
Besides, I noticed that in default "config-linear-rate.yaml", actually two chaincodes are configured: 1.marbles 2.simple So I wonder whether the error log means that "simple" chaincode was not successfully instantiated?
And I checked the docker container. Both "marbles" and "simple" chaincodes' containers are started and running: Does docker container running means the instantiation of chaincodes is successful? Thanks.
After I remove "simple" chaincode from network config file, the issue disappeared. It seems that the instantiation of "marbles" chaincode was successful. But another error happened. And I will create another issue to track the new error. I will close this issue now.
Context
Env: 2 orgs, each org has 2 peers
Steps: Execute command "node benchmark/simple/main.js -n /home/yzapps/hyperledger/yingzi/caliper/network/fabric-v1.4-yingzi/2org2peercouchdb/fabric-node.json" note:1.omit "-c" parameter, which means using the default "config-linear-rate.yaml" as the benchmark config file 2.The content of used fabric-node.json is as following: fabric-node.zip
Expected Behavior
The benchmark test ran successfully and report was generated normally.
Actual Behavior
"instantiate proposal was bad: Error: REQUEST_TIMEOUT" error happened. The detailed log is attached: benchmark_log.zip
Could you please help me figure out what is wrong here? Thank you.