Closed xq840622 closed 2 years ago
Merging #215 (f3305a0) into main (4f34271) will increase coverage by
0.06%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.:exclamation: Current head f3305a0 differs from pull request most recent head 4496d10. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4496d10 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #215 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.09% 76.15% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 193 193
Lines 14064 14075 +11
==========================================
+ Hits 10702 10719 +17
+ Misses 2393 2389 -4
+ Partials 969 967 -2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
pkg/client/channel/invoke/txnhandler.go | 83.75% <100.00%> (+1.19%) |
:arrow_up: |
pkg/fab/ccpackager/javapackager/packager.go | 75.28% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
pkg/util/concurrent/lazyref/lazyref.go | 96.31% <0.00%> (+3.68%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f34271...4496d10. Read the comment docs.
When using couchdb, Json is stored alphabetically, while golang "encoding/json" orders json by struct-field order. There could be an error when user invoke/query peer with both couchdb-peer and leveldb-peer. The same problem could also happen when we use both javaCC and goCC.