Closed FabioPinheiro closed 3 days ago
96 files ±0 96 suites ±0 21m 52s :stopwatch: -35s 826 tests ±0 818 :white_check_mark: ±0 8 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0 833 runs ±0 825 :white_check_mark: ±0 8 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit 26ae6a0e. ± Comparison against base commit e5e34113.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
16 files ±0 16 suites ±0 2s :stopwatch: ±0s 34 tests ±0 34 :white_check_mark: ±0 0 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0 59 runs ±0 59 :white_check_mark: ±0 0 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit 26ae6a0e. ± Comparison against base commit e5e34113.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
@bvoiturier can you review?
Hey @CryptoKnightIOG do you want to have a look at this PR. Since you are doing ATL-6933:
The ErrorResponse stored in DB should then be exposed through the REST API for later retrieval by the user. Those should be returned as part of the connect, issue, and present flow records.
In shared/core/src/main/scala/org/hyperledger/identus/shared/models/Failure.scala
I'm adding a case class FailureInfo
just to read the error from the DB.
We don't have access to the error type (because we do not encode that) but we have all the necessary information to inform the user. What do you think?
Description:
ATL-6931 Note the branch name is wrong
Checklist: