Open dbluhm opened 2 years ago
We'd want to do this for node and plenum. I'm in support of the proposal.
Does it make sense, to incorporate that into the pipeline? https://github.com/rickstaa/action-black/
I am in favor of adding a format checker to the pipeline; this is how ACA-Py does it. If there are issues, it doesn't automatically commit reformatting so the original author has to fix formatting themselves. I personally favor this approach over any auto-commits from the pipeline.
Currently the ubtunu-20.04 branches for plenum, node and sovrin token-plugin use the indy-shared-gha linting process from here.
It is currently using flake8 in with the following versions:
flake8==3.8.4
pep8==1.7.1
pep8-naming==0.6.1
The token-plugin is also linted with the updated versions of those.
Should we use the existing one and upgrade the definitions? Or switch to black?
In other python projects in the Hyperledger Ecosystem, black is used to help keep coding style consistent. I think Node would benefit from a similar treatment. This would however mean that we would need to essentially reformat every file in the project which is less than ideal. I think the improved formatting would be worth it but I'm interested to hear thoughts from others.