Closed zenangst closed 8 years ago
I kinda like how the last function call reads. It is very readable and describes its intent.
It is actually free in Cocoapods, don't understand why. :smile: but yes, I agree, Keychain makes more sense. It's clearer.
My vote is on Keychain
, what about you @vadymmarkov ?
+1 for Keychain
And default service is also a good idea.
@vadymmarkov @RamonGilabert made a pull request :grin:
Closing as #3 is merged.
I've been thinking about the public API, does it have to reference the pod name or could we call the main struct
Keychain
instead to make it more implicit to what it actually does?So instead of;
We would get
Also, maybe the
service
should be the second argument and have it default to the application bundle identifier so that you don't have to set it.What do you guys think? @RamonGilabert @vadymmarkov @attila-at-hyper