Closed ericpre closed 8 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
44e2d29
) 86.25% compared to head (e3930b7
) 86.23%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
In the links it sounds like the new runner is supposed to replace the existing macos runner, but it seems to me that we would now simply run an additional run?
I couldn't find any information on when the macos-14
(using arm chips) will replace the macos-latest
(using intel chips). I would expect that the intel runner will be around for a while, which also mean that once in a while we may need to update the macos-14
to a new version.
We will need to test both architectures for a while.
OK, I just think we should also be somewhat economic on resources of test runners and try not to escalate the instances too much.
Similar as https://github.com/hyperspy/hyperspy/pull/3305.
https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-introducing-the-new-m1-macos-runner-available-to-open-source/ https://github.blog/2024-01-17-github-hosted-runners-double-the-power-for-open-source/
Progress of the PR
upcoming_changes
folder (seeupcoming_changes/README.rst
),docs/readthedocs.org:rosettasciio
build of this PR (link in github checks)