Open makew0rld opened 5 months ago
From the co-op act, section 143:
Where the Minister is of the opinion that the business and affairs of the co-operative are not being conducted on a co-operative basis, the Minister may, after giving the co-operative an opportunity to be heard, [...] issue a certificate of amendment changing the co-operative into a corporation subject to the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 and, where necessary for the purpose, changing the co-operative into a corporation without share capital. 2019, c. 15, Sched. 8, s. 8.
To me this makes it extremely clear that any co-op created under the co-op act cannot be a not-for-profit in the Ontario corporation sense of the word.
The relevant line in the handbook is this one:
Instead, we are a not-for-profit co-operative.
Updated related document from ontario.coop: Co-ops are different from Non-Profits.pdf
The title using the term "non-profit" which is very frustrating and confusing, but the text of the document makes clear to me that co-operatives are completely distinct from "not-for-profit".
Another tricky section in this document:
Under certain circumstances, it is possible for a co‑op to operate carry on business as a NFP from a tax perspective (i.e. under the Income Tax Act).
I suspect this is incorrect, and they mean that it's possible for a co-op to operate as an NPO (non-profit organization) or just non-profit under the Income Tax Act. "not-for-profit" doesn't seem to appear anywhere in the Income Tax Act document, so it's hard for me to see this paragraph as correct.
Overall, I think this document supports my position that we should stop describing ourselves as "not-for-profit".
These two terms are not interchangeable, and mean different things. Both are used in the handbook. Ideally we would only use one.
My current understanding is that "not-for-profit" is a specific type of corporation that can be formed in Ontario. and not one that is covered by the Co-operative Corporations Act. Instead it is covered by the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act which has no relevance to us. By not having share capital, we are very similar to a not-for-profit, but legally are not the same thing.
My current understanding is that "non-profit" is mainly a tax term, and so if the CRA considers you a non-profit then you can benefit from tax-exempt status etc. We are currently considered a non-profit in the eyes of the CRA.
My premature conclusion here would be that we should remove all reference to "not-for-profit" in the handbook, and instead mention our "without share capital" status when needed.
Resources:
cc @LexaMichaelides as she may be interested in this :)