Closed PranaykumarSingeetham closed 4 years ago
Hi Pranay,
The terminology is given in my PhD thesis that you can find in the doc/ folder.
kappa -> thermal conductivity
subscript tr refers to the trans-rotational energy mode
subscript ve refers to the vibro-electronic energy mode
Make sure chemistry is enabled in constant/hTCProperties and constant/chemistryProperties and that your set of reactions is present in the relevant constant/hTCReactionsXXX dict. Please refer to the Wiki on this topic: https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/wiki/How-to-::-Chemistry
dQ works the same way as in reactingFoam. It's just a field being printed and you gave the right meaning. If you're seeing zeros in the entire domain, it means you did not enable chemistry.
Thanks
Hi Pranay,
Out of curiosity, what type of TCI are you thinking about? Note that it would be good to first run the code without TCI on a test case (2D). I did work on that at some point but gave up due to the unavailability of computational power.
cheers JJ
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 13:36, Vince notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi Pranay,
1.
The terminology is given in my PhD thesis that you can find in the doc/ folder. kappa -> thermal conductivity subscript tr refers to the trans-rotational energy mode subscript ve refers to the vibro-electronic energy mode 2.
Make sure chemistry is enabled in constant/hTCProperties and constant/chemistryProperties and that your set of reactions is present in the relevant constant/hTCReactionsXXX dict. Please refer to the Wiki on this topic: https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/wiki/How-to-::-Chemistry 3.
dQ works the same way as in reactingFoam. It's just a field being printed and you gave the right meaning. If you're seeing zeros in the entire domain, it means you did not enable chemistry.
Thanks
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/issues/28?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADALDFS2KUNE7F4TS4LICCTQQ3MERA5CNFSM4JFZHZT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECMXCWI#issuecomment-546926937, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADALDFRQZJXBHTXAJWCXWOLQQ3MERANCNFSM4JFZHZTQ .
-- Dr. ir. Jimmy-John Hoste Research Fellow at German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology ---- Spacecraft Bunsenstraße 10 | D-37073 Göttingen | Germany
Hi Pranay,
1. The terminology is given in my PhD thesis that you can find in the doc/ folder. _kappa_ -> thermal conductivity subscript _tr_ refers to the trans-rotational energy mode subscript _ve_ refers to the vibro-electronic energy mode 2. Make sure chemistry is enabled in _constant/hTCProperties_ and _constant/chemistryProperties_ and that your set of reactions is present in the relevant _constant/hTCReactionsXXX_ dict. Please refer to the Wiki on this topic: https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/wiki/How-to-::-Chemistry 3. dQ works the same way as in reactingFoam. It's just a field being printed and you gave the right meaning. If you're seeing zeros in the entire domain, it means you did not enable chemistry.
Thanks
Thanks. I will go through your PhD thesis and other documents. I think I made some mistakes while converting twotemperature to a singletemperature solver. I will try to rectify them.
Hi Pranay, Out of curiosity, what type of TCI are you thinking about? Note that it would be good to first run the code without TCI on a test case (2D). I did work on that at some point but gave up due to the unavailability of computational power. cheers JJ … On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 13:36, Vince @.**> wrote: Hi Pranay, 1. The terminology is given in my PhD thesis that you can find in the doc/ folder. kappa -> thermal conductivity subscript tr refers to the trans-rotational energy mode subscript ve refers to the vibro-electronic energy mode 2. Make sure chemistry is enabled in constant/hTCProperties and constant/chemistryProperties and that your set of reactions is present in the relevant constant/hTCReactionsXXX* dict. Please refer to the Wiki on this topic: https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/wiki/How-to-::-Chemistry 3. dQ works the same way as in reactingFoam. It's just a field being printed and you gave the right meaning. If you're seeing zeros in the entire domain, it means you did not enable chemistry. Thanks — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADALDFS2KUNE7F4TS4LICCTQQ3MERA5CNFSM4JFZHZT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECMXCWI#issuecomment-546926937>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADALDFRQZJXBHTXAJWCXWOLQQ3MERANCNFSM4JFZHZTQ . -- Dr. ir. Jimmy-John Hoste Research Fellow at German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology ---- Spacecraft Bunsenstraße 10 | D-37073 Göttingen | Germany
Thank you very much for your suggestion. I am trying to model scramjet without turbuelnce chemistry coupling as you already said that would be a good point to start with it. I just want to see some simulations running :-). I am thinking about EDC model for a validation study. I also wanted to study the non premixed combustion with flamelet modeling in OpenFOAM. So, I am currently reading computational combustion theory and its implementation. With some interest, I would like to know what type of simulations that you had worked ? Were you trying to do LES in Combustion ?
Jimmy-John's publications (PhD, papers) are in our Wiki: Publications and you will find answers to your questions there.
As a side note, you can NOT run a LES simulation in hyStrath yet for the same reason that there is no chemistry-turbulence interaction model yet. It was not a priority, a bit of work is needed to reuse what is available for all single-temperature OpenFOAM solvers (edits to be made: alpha -> alphatr, kappa -> kappatr, T -> Tt).
Jimmy-John's publications (PhD, papers) are in our Wiki: Publications and you will find answers to your questions there.
As a side note, you can NOT run a LES simulation in hyStrath yet for the same reason that there is no chemistry-turbulence interaction model yet. It was not a priority, a bit of work is needed to reuse what is available for all single-temperature OpenFOAM solvers (edits to be made: alpha -> alphatr, kappa -> kappatr, T -> Tt).
Okay. Thanks for the information. :-)
Hi Pranay,
If I recall there is an EDC solver somewhere in openfoam, perhaps an older version. I did "laminar chemistry" and EDM for TCI as it runs fast but of course a huge assumption. EDC is extremely costly, would advice PaSR then or maybe the LEM. LES I wouldn't advice in general, the cost is huge, of course the advantage is that the TCI should have a smaller impact as it involves the modeled scale if not mistaken.
cheers JJ
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 08:39, PranaykumarSingeetham < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Hi Pranay, Out of curiosity, what type of TCI are you thinking about? Note that it would be good to first run the code without TCI on a test case (2D). I did work on that at some point but gave up due to the unavailability of computational power. cheers JJ … <#m-5148405090621158539> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 13:36, Vince @.**> wrote: Hi Pranay, 1. The terminology is given in my PhD thesis that you can find in the doc/ folder. kappa -> thermal conductivity subscript tr refers to the trans-rotational energy mode subscript ve refers to the vibro-electronic energy mode 2. Make sure chemistry is enabled in constant/hTCProperties and constant/chemistryProperties and that your set of reactions is present in the relevant constant/hTCReactionsXXX* dict. Please refer to the Wiki on this topic: https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/wiki/How-to-::-Chemistry 3. dQ works the same way as in reactingFoam. It's just a field being printed and you gave the right meaning. If you're seeing zeros in the entire domain, it means you did not enable chemistry. Thanks — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28 https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/issues/28?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADALDFS2KUNE7F4TS4LICCTQQ3MERA5CNFSM4JFZHZT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECMXCWI#issuecomment-546926937>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADALDFRQZJXBHTXAJWCXWOLQQ3MERANCNFSM4JFZHZTQ . -- Dr. ir. Jimmy-John Hoste Research Fellow at German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology ---- Spacecraft Bunsenstraße 10 | D-37073 Göttingen | Germany
Thank you very much for your suggestion. I am trying to model scramjet without turbuelnce chemistry coupling as you already said that would be a good point to start with it. I just want to see some simulations running :-). I am thinking about EDC model for a validation study. I also wanted to simulate non premixed combustion with flamelet modeling in OpenFOAM. I am currently reading computational combustion theory and its implementation. With some interest, I would like to know what type of simulations that you had worked ? Were you trying to do LES in Combustion ?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/issues/28?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADALDFRLZXJU5TWH75U7K7LQQ7SDDA5CNFSM4JFZHZT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECPQ3MQ#issuecomment-547294642, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADALDFVBTNQSN7NVNP2RAP3QQ7SDDANCNFSM4JFZHZTQ .
-- Dr. ir. Jimmy-John Hoste Research Fellow at German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology ---- Spacecraft Bunsenstraße 10 | D-37073 Göttingen | Germany
Hi Pranay, If I recall there is an EDC solver somewhere in openfoam, perhaps an older version. I did "laminar chemistry" and EDM for TCI as it runs fast but of course a huge assumption. EDC is extremely costly, would advice PaSR then or maybe the LEM. LES I wouldn't advice in general, the cost is huge, of course the advantage is that the TCI should have a smaller impact as it involves the modeled scale if not mistaken. cheers JJ On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 08:39, PranaykumarSingeetham < notifications@github.com> wrote: … Hi Pranay, Out of curiosity, what type of TCI are you thinking about? Note that it would be good to first run the code without TCI on a test case (2D). I did work on that at some point but gave up due to the unavailability of computational power. cheers JJ … <#m-5148405090621158539> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 13:36, Vince @.**> wrote: Hi Pranay, 1. The terminology is given in my PhD thesis that you can find in the doc/ folder. kappa -> thermal conductivity subscript tr refers to the trans-rotational energy mode subscript ve refers to the vibro-electronic energy mode 2. Make sure chemistry is enabled in constant/hTCProperties and constant/chemistryProperties and that your set of reactions is present in the relevant constant/hTCReactionsXXX* dict. Please refer to the Wiki on this topic: https://github.com/vincentcasseau/hyStrath/wiki/How-to-::-Chemistry 3. dQ works the same way as in reactingFoam. It's just a field being printed and you gave the right meaning. If you're seeing zeros in the entire domain, it means you did not enable chemistry. Thanks — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28 <#28>?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADALDFS2KUNE7F4TS4LICCTQQ3MERA5CNFSM4JFZHZT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECMXCWI#issuecomment-546926937>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADALDFRQZJXBHTXAJWCXWOLQQ3MERANCNFSM4JFZHZTQ . -- Dr. ir. Jimmy-John Hoste Research Fellow at German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology ---- Spacecraft Bunsenstraße 10 | D-37073 Göttingen | Germany Thank you very much for your suggestion. I am trying to model scramjet without turbuelnce chemistry coupling as you already said that would be a good point to start with it. I just want to see some simulations running :-). I am thinking about EDC model for a validation study. I also wanted to simulate non premixed combustion with flamelet modeling in OpenFOAM. I am currently reading computational combustion theory and its implementation. With some interest, I would like to know what type of simulations that you had worked ? Were you trying to do LES in Combustion ? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADALDFRLZXJU5TWH75U7K7LQQ7SDDA5CNFSM4JFZHZT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECPQ3MQ#issuecomment-547294642>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADALDFVBTNQSN7NVNP2RAP3QQ7SDDANCNFSM4JFZHZTQ . -- Dr. ir. Jimmy-John Hoste Research Fellow at German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology ---- Spacecraft Bunsenstraße 10 | D-37073 Göttingen | Germany
Thank you very much for your advice and giving me an overview on computational aspects of different TCI models. Once after completing the basic test case, then I will implement the TCI.
What I understood was that this solver calculates the reaction rates using arrhenius kinetic expression and turbulence chemistry coupling is ignored.I will be working on this turbulence chemistry coupling as a part of my phd work.
Currently, I am simulating supersonic combustion with your hyfoam solver. To know the boundary conditions, I read createFields header file.I have few doubts.
I could not able find the terminology of "kappatr" and "kappave" and how to ignite the mixture ? Do I need to patch the region with high temperature as similar to the reactingFoam cases ? Do I have to give energy released per unit time (dQ) as B.C's/I.C' condition or is this field created during the calculations or what exactly this dQ means here?
Thanks