Closed AMChalkie closed 4 years ago
@AMChalkie thanks for the report, and our team also aware of that it is possible to have discrepancy between cpm and logFC. One of the plan is adding two modes for the logFC (averaged sgRNA-levels or directly from gene-level cpm). Regarding your number_sgrna_up
and number_sgrna_down
, Let me think about it.
Thank you,
Hyun-Hwan Jeong
Duplicate of #9
Hi,
I've come across a case with confusing results:
At the gene_stat level, we sometimes get cpm_a < cpm_b, while logFC is -ve. It's to do with the combining of the replicates, but I think it would be useful to have information on the gene level of how many probes are consistent (in this case 3 or 4, or perhaps number_sgrna_up, number_sgrna_down?
Thanks Alistair
Gene level: n_sgrna cpm_a cpm_b logFC 4 10.20239 28.36188 -1.069289
sgrna level n_a n_b phat_a vhat_a phat_b vhat_b cpm_a cpm_b logFC 1 1 1.461569e-05 0 8.329479e-07 0 14.615689 0.83294789 -3.090759 1 1 1.686701e-05 0 1.114901e-04 0 16.867005 111.49007463 2.654428 1 1 5.288807e-06 0 8.329479e-08 0 5.288807 0.08329479 -2.537360 1 1 4.038075e-06 0 1.041185e-06 0 4.038075 1.04118486 -1.303466