Open EnricoAhlers opened 7 months ago
I want to have the possibility to tell Ray-X:
In The RAY-UI way:
which file to trace define for which objects I want to export the rays specify the names of the exported files. Or, at least, I need to prepend something to the filenames (normally a number,'n_') the folder where I want the results to be saved. Even Better:
I want to have the possibility to pass an RML that I have in memory to RAY-X, or pass the path of the rml file to load. define for which objects I want to export the rays. Even better I would like to be able to specify some properties. Numbers of rays, absolute intensity (If this is known for the source), fwhm horizontal and vertical, bandwidth. I want the option to save the results as files, specifying the folder and the filename, or I want the wrapper to just return the results, and then I can decide what to do with them.
First step: Providing a Python API for RAYX similar to https://github.com/hz-b/raypyng.
It would be good to add RAYX functionality directly to raypyng. The issue: Ray-UI runs in interactive mode while RAYX currently is one-shot. We need to discuss whether we want an interactive mode CLI for RAYX too.