search

i-adopt / core-group

For group administration and preparation of activities
0 stars 0 forks source link

Short terminology survey #5

Open mabablue opened 4 years ago

mabablue commented 4 years ago

Should we develop a 7-min survey about observable properties terminologies as suggested by PLB for those who don't want to fill the long survey? And when should that be launched (together with the longer one - 2nd period, beginning of April, or just at the end of that second launch?)

mabablue commented 4 years ago

JG: I am wondering what the goal of the short survey is, and how the terminologies survey is different than the first survey.

mabablue commented 4 years ago

The idea was born at the virtual session, when PLB said that the other one is too long for busy managers like him. Survey 1 might be ignored but survey 2 (the short one) might be accepted and would avoid that we lose important terminologies. The difference is that we would just have the most important questions included there only just for terminology provider. I am going to propose a draft to be discussed, if considered useful.

mabablue commented 4 years ago

Please look at this draft and comment: https://survey.lter-europe.net/index.php/219398?lang=en

gwemon commented 4 years ago

@mabablue I like the short survey.

graybeal commented 4 years ago

Me too. Minor suggestion: Make the last question read "Please name at least one data repository, system or data product that uses the terminology for observable properties."

mabablue commented 4 years ago

thanks! I have updated it accordingly.

mariutzica commented 4 years ago

@mabablue I like the short survey, thank you for revising and putting together. One suggestion I would have is perhaps to consider disabling the response mandatory (*) feature for the short answer questions 2.3, 2.4. Although it risks reducing the amount of information available to us if the answer is not provided, it may encourage more responses. We may also be able to determine the answers from the link provided in 2.1.

SirkoS commented 4 years ago

the questions removed are the following ones, right:

the remainder seemed in line with the long survey.

PS: in question 3.4 there seem to be some empty lines in the question text.

mabablue commented 4 years ago

well not only, I also removed all questions related to the data annotation (use of terminologies). Question 3.4 is now updated

mabablue commented 4 years ago

I now created a short survey for annotation practices https://survey.lter-europe.net/index.php/351768?lang=en

mabablue commented 4 years ago

The open question is: should we also refer to Nitrogen here, and add related questions or not.

graybeal commented 4 years ago

I vote 'don't refer to it in the questions', but you should mention the more detailed survey that uses nitrogen as an example case study, that we would really appreciate people filling out if they are willing and able.