i18next / i18next-parser

Parse your code to extract translation keys/values and manage your catalog files
MIT License
488 stars 199 forks source link

Build(deps): bump esbuild from 0.17.18 to 0.18.3 #838

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 year ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Bumps esbuild from 0.17.18 to 0.18.3.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.18.3

  • Fix a panic due to empty static class blocks (#3161)

    This release fixes a bug where an internal invariant that was introduced in the previous release was sometimes violated, which then caused a panic. It happened when bundling code containing an empty static class block with both minification and bundling enabled.

v0.18.2

  • Lower static blocks when static fields are lowered (#2800, #2950, #3025)

    This release fixes a bug where esbuild incorrectly did not lower static class blocks when static class fields needed to be lowered. For example, the following code should print 1 2 3 but previously printed 2 1 3 instead due to this bug:

    // Original code
    class Foo {
      static x = console.log(1)
      static { console.log(2) }
      static y = console.log(3)
    }
    

    // Old output (with --supported:class-static-field=false) class Foo { static { console.log(2); } } __publicField(Foo, "x", console.log(1)); __publicField(Foo, "y", console.log(3));

    // New output (with --supported:class-static-field=false) class Foo { } __publicField(Foo, "x", console.log(1)); console.log(2); __publicField(Foo, "y", console.log(3));

  • Use static blocks to implement --keep-names on classes (#2389)

    This change fixes a bug where the name property could previously be incorrect within a class static context when using --keep-names. The problem was that the name property was being initialized after static blocks were run instead of before. This has been fixed by moving the name property initializer into a static block at the top of the class body:

    // Original code
    if (typeof Foo === 'undefined') {
      let Foo = class {
        static test = this.name
      }
      console.log(Foo.test)
    }
    

    // Old output (with --keep-names) if (typeof Foo === "undefined") {

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.18.3

  • Fix a panic due to empty static class blocks (#3161)

    This release fixes a bug where an internal invariant that was introduced in the previous release was sometimes violated, which then caused a panic. It happened when bundling code containing an empty static class block with both minification and bundling enabled.

0.18.2

  • Lower static blocks when static fields are lowered (#2800, #2950, #3025)

    This release fixes a bug where esbuild incorrectly did not lower static class blocks when static class fields needed to be lowered. For example, the following code should print 1 2 3 but previously printed 2 1 3 instead due to this bug:

    // Original code
    class Foo {
      static x = console.log(1)
      static { console.log(2) }
      static y = console.log(3)
    }
    

    // Old output (with --supported:class-static-field=false) class Foo { static { console.log(2); } } __publicField(Foo, "x", console.log(1)); __publicField(Foo, "y", console.log(3));

    // New output (with --supported:class-static-field=false) class Foo { } __publicField(Foo, "x", console.log(1)); console.log(2); __publicField(Foo, "y", console.log(3));

  • Use static blocks to implement --keep-names on classes (#2389)

    This change fixes a bug where the name property could previously be incorrect within a class static context when using --keep-names. The problem was that the name property was being initialized after static blocks were run instead of before. This has been fixed by moving the name property initializer into a static block at the top of the class body:

    // Original code
    if (typeof Foo === 'undefined') {
      let Foo = class {
        static test = this.name
      }
      console.log(Foo.test)
    }
    

... (truncated)

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
socket-security[bot] commented 1 year ago

New and updated dependency changes detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: esbuild@0.17.18

codecov-commenter commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (2b9a3a8) 93.81% compared to head (59acfd5) 93.81%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #838 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.81% 93.81% ======================================= Files 11 11 Lines 1762 1762 ======================================= Hits 1653 1653 Misses 109 109 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Superseded by #839.