search

i40-Tools / I40KG

Contains the development for the Industry 4.0 standards knowledge graph (I40KG). Its current collaborative development is driven by VoCol - http://vocol.iais.fraunhofer.de/sto/
64 stars 24 forks source link

has Edition Property for the standard. #33

Closed PriyankaNanjappa closed 5 years ago

PriyankaNanjappa commented 6 years ago

The documentation provided for dcterms:hasVersion is quoted below. "Has Version: A related resource that is a version, edition, or adaptation of the described resource. Notes: Dublin Core: This term is intended to be used with non-literal values as defined in the DCMI Abstract Model (http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage Board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration."

This is intended to be used with a non-literal value but I don't think it is defined as of now. My suggestion was to have our own sto:hasEdition Probaby just as a float value as of now.

igrangel commented 6 years ago

Please, when you implement something, write in the issue the link to the code. Before deciding to have our own sto:hasEdition property, please have a look at the sioc:term_latest_version` property. In addition, please consult the Open Data Vocabularies service. Please also have a look at the examples of the use of the lates_version property here, in the PROV ontology.

igrangel commented 6 years ago

Have you found new insights regarding this issue?

PriyankaNanjappa commented 6 years ago

prov:wasRevisionOf and sioc:term_latest_version could be the 2 properties that talk about the different editions (History) of a Standards document. hasEdition is still necessary to just depict the version number of a Document. The newly identified will help relate such different versions of the document

igrangel commented 6 years ago

What about bibo:edition, - http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs/bibo?

PriyankaNanjappa commented 5 years ago

I think bibo:edition is a better choice in place of sto:hasEdition shall we make the change?

igrangel commented 5 years ago

Since the bibo ontology is not online, please keep the sto:hasEdition.