Open igrangel opened 6 years ago
The statements for sto:ISO_42010_ArchitectureDescription and sto:ISO_42010_Viewpoint are a first idea to map the classifications and frameworks to ISO_42010 concepts. I am not yet sure if they are really equal in the terms of owl:equivalentClass
but need some type of relation.
Can you link here the existing documents where the standard is explained? The source you utilized to define these classes.
According to the official source, an Architecture description
is defined as follows: "An architecture description shall identify the system-of-interest and include supplementary information as
determined by the project and/or organization. " The sto:StandardizationFramework
aims to define existing Standardization Frameworks, e.g., RAMI, IIRA, but also, the Administration Shell. The idea here is to categorize any existing categorization of standards. So, I think it may be an upper concept than the Architecture description
. Please, provide your opinion here.
The class ISO_42010_ArchitectureDescription is declared as
owl:equivalentClass
to thesto:StandardizationFramework
, @sebbader, could you please explain which is the rationale behind this?