Closed SpyrosKou closed 5 years ago
Yes, definitely a mistake. The initial idea was to reuse the muto:tag
but it was complicated for the need we have. So, please go ahead.
I merged everything into the master branch since we had other branches but I think now is fine.
Thank you,
I created a pull request.
Please, create a link to the line of code when this type of issues occur.
Hello again, I noticed that sto:hasTag is declared both as a DataProperty and an ObjectPropery. In particular:
The individuals currently using the sto:hasTag exclusively use it as a DataProperty. (138 occurencies) Perhaps it would be best to remove the ObjectPropery sto:hasTag definition since punning an IRI for more than one property types is currently unsupported. See: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/#F12:_Punning
I could create a pull request if you agree.