Open igrangel opened 7 years ago
This image, taken from the document above provides quite interesting relations between standards.
We should be able to model this by extending the current
relatedTo
relation into these new relations.
According to the diagram, the following six different relations can be extracted. These relations have to be checked and the semantics of each one of them should be understood. Generally, they can be subsumed under the relatedTo
property. But this is something of which we are still not sure about.
isPartOf
IEC_62714(AML)uses
MathMLfollows
UMLusesStructureOf
IEC_61804-3(EDDL)defines
IEC_61804-2(EDDL)hasInfluenceIn
IEC_61804-2(EDDL) - prov:wasInfluencedBy ?In addition, https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/issues/17, B2MML is the implementation of ISA 95, thus:
isImplementationOf
ISA_95DIN SPEC 16592 hasPredecesor OPC UA
DIN SPEC 16592 hasPredecesor AML
What about to use the prov:wasDerivedFrom
from the PROV ontology to express the predecessor?
DIN SPEC 16592 prov:wasDerivedFrom AML
DIN SPEC 16592 prov:wasDerivedFrom OPC UA
This can be considered as a gold standard for a Standards graph. The aim would be if we can infer some of the existing relations that are in this figure.
Interessting point, especially as they connect standards to (in my view) technologies. It's UML-only, right? That would imply that we have to import it into our namespace.
This document page 72.