i40-Tools / I40KG

Contains the development for the Industry 4.0 standards knowledge graph (I40KG). Its current collaborative development is driven by VoCol - http://vocol.iais.fraunhofer.de/sto/
64 stars 24 forks source link

To check diagram with standard relations #8

Open igrangel opened 7 years ago

igrangel commented 7 years ago

This document page 72.

igrangel commented 6 years ago

image This image, taken from the document above provides quite interesting relations between standards. We should be able to model this by extending the current relatedTorelation into these new relations.

igrangel commented 6 years ago

According to the diagram, the following six different relations can be extracted. These relations have to be checked and the semantics of each one of them should be understood. Generally, they can be subsumed under the relatedTo property. But this is something of which we are still not sure about.

  1. IEC_62424(CAEX) isPartOf IEC_62714(AML)
  2. IEC_62714(AML) uses MathML
  3. SysML follows UML
  4. OPC UA usesStructureOf IEC_61804-3(EDDL)
  5. ISO_15745 defines IEC_61804-2(EDDL)
  6. IEC_61499 hasInfluenceIn IEC_61804-2(EDDL) - prov:wasInfluencedBy ?
igrangel commented 6 years ago

In addition, https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/issues/17, B2MML is the implementation of ISA 95, thus:

  1. B2MML isImplementationOf ISA_95
igrangel commented 6 years ago
DIN SPEC 16592 hasPredecesor OPC UA
DIN SPEC 16592 hasPredecesor AML

What about to use the prov:wasDerivedFrom from the PROV ontology to express the predecessor?

DIN SPEC 16592 prov:wasDerivedFrom AML
DIN SPEC 16592 prov:wasDerivedFrom OPC UA
igrangel commented 6 years ago

This can be considered as a gold standard for a Standards graph. The aim would be if we can infer some of the existing relations that are in this figure.

sebbader commented 5 years ago

Interessting point, especially as they connect standards to (in my view) technologies. It's UML-only, right? That would imply that we have to import it into our namespace.