Open mmaltsev opened 6 years ago
This issue is of great importance for the method since you detected inconsistencies. Therefore, we should think in an automated method to validate the accuracy of the method. I was suggested to used ten-fold cross-validation. How can we implement such a method?
Manually reviewing enriched version of the STO I found a number of inconsistencies and confusions, such as:
sto:SCOR
-rdf:type
-dbo:Person
sto:W3C_SPARQL
-rdf:type
-dby:PsychologicalFeature100023100
sto:IEC_61400
-rdf:type
-Turbine104498523
Obviously, these are the problems of DBpedia but we should think, is there any way to avoid such errors.