i7 / kerkerkruip

Kerkerkruip - the interactive fiction roguelike game
kerkerkruip.org
84 stars 13 forks source link

Go through all treasures #18

Closed VictorGijsbers closed 12 years ago

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

I'm planning to go through all the treasures in the game (i.e., the Items file), in an attempt to improve what may be improved and remove what is just uninteresting. Every treasure should be cool.

I'll update this issue as I make changes. Comments are welcome.

curiousdannii commented 12 years ago

A few of the item names feel a bit awkward to me. I have a few suggestions which you can take or leave!

Bodice of body -> Bodice of vigor / Bodice of physique I would never think of gloves when reading the word "guantlet", though maybe that's just me. Maybe change it, or change the description to make it more clear what they are. Sneaky sword could be changed to Sword of sneakiness The demon lord's diadem -> Diadem of the demon lord

ektemple commented 12 years ago

I agree on the bodice of body. (I also wonder if a non-gendered term might be better than bodice, but on the other hand it's kind of fun to think of a bodice as an item for warfare.)

Gauntlet is a very common term for an armored glove, at least on this side of the waters. It's all over the place in fantasy and historical fictions, including even Assassin's Creed. I have a hard time coming up with any better term. On the other hand, you have a point that it might be nice to mention that it is a glove for the benefit of folks who haven't encountered it before. (On the third hand, I've never resented any work that sent me to the dictionary, but I have a feeling I'm in the minority there.)

I like the sound of sneaking sword rather than sneaky, but that's probably idiosyncratic.

curiousdannii commented 12 years ago

I had to move the references to the people out of the Items extension -- by referencing them before they were defined the order of people listed in "remember" and the new powers menu was incorrect.

Alternatively we could move the monsters extension before the items extension in story.ni, but I don't know if that might have other consequences.

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

Aw, am I the only one who loves the sound of "bodice of body"? Though I just realised that everything depends on how it is pronounced. I was assuming it is "bodiss", but perhaps it is pronounced like "bodies"? "Bodiss of body" sounds awesome, "bodies of body" sounds awful. And while full may seem to be better than some, awful is not better than awesome. ;)

Gauntlet is a standard RPG term. But I suppose that using the word "gloves" in the description can't hurt.

I've been trying to avoid calling everything "the A of B", hence the "demon lord's diadem" and so on. If you think this is a flawed objective, let me know. (There is this cheap fantasy vibe surrounding the "A of B", Every bad fantasy writer calls his books things like "The Path of Daggers", "Temple of the Winds", "Game of Thrones", "Pawn of Prophecy", "City of Golden Shadow", and so on, and so forth.)

I like "sneaking sword". (It turns out to be the cursed singing sword! Hm... not easy to do, given that Mouser is holding it, but otherwise it would be a great idea. The singing sword would of course give you a huge penalty to hiding.)

ektemple commented 12 years ago

I pronounce bodice as you do, Victor, but it's actually not the sound that I object to (not speaking for Dannii here, obviously). It's that "body" would never be used that way in English, because body isn't a quality. Neither is "mind"--though "spirit" is. A Bodice of Spirit (Suspenders of Spirit if we prefer alliteration) is quite natural, but you'd need to go with something like Bodice of Bodily Puissance or Mantle of Mindfulness to capture the sense of a quality, or else just go with Bodice of the Body or Mantle of the Mind for a different sort of effect.

Now, Kerkerkruip does treat body as a quality: It becomes a measurable thing due to its use as a faculty, and so bodice of body makes some sense in that regard--but it still sounds odd. There's also the chain of associations: The bodice is a feminine article of clothing, and Bodice of Body kind of sounds like an enhancement to the female form... (If you're an etymology buff, bodice of body is also a bit weird-sounding, because bodice means--etymologically--bodies.)

I think avoiding the standard fantasy trope A of B is a worthy goal.

I like the sneaking/singing sword!

curiousdannii commented 12 years ago

Bodice is a great word, but body just doesn't belong with it. Can't really explain why. So that's why I suggested vigour and physique -- two words that might be better, and are femininesque too. And I'd be all for some more feminine objects! How about a garter?

Yeah we don't want everything to be A of B. The Sneaking Sword is good. I don't like "The demon lord's diadem". Maybe because it sounds as if the demon lord is known to us, but he isn't.

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

OK, I turned the bodice of body into the bodice of physique. I've also added two new items that only work when the player is under the influence of ment. I'm quite happy with the periapt of prophecy, an epic item that -- when you are under the influence of ment -- predicts the strength of your attack roll. I.e., it says things like "If you choose to attack, your performance will be weak." or "If you choose to attack, your performance will be heroic." These predictions are always true, and therefore very useful!

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

Not unimportant change: flash grenades now blind temporarily, for 15 - (body/3) - (smoke penalty) turns. This should make them more useful.

ektemple commented 12 years ago

I like the new periapt! Say, is Kerkerkruip the only roguelike that features explicit drug consumption? If fantasy adventurers were real, I'm sure their attitudes toward drugs wouldn't be far off from Lance Armstrong's. Instead, we're meant to believe that they quaff sanitary "potions" with no addictive potential whatever...

If I were interviewing Victor for a mainstream publication, I suppose I'd also have ask whether the permissive state policies toward drugs in the Netherlands influenced the game.

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

The Binding of Isaac has the player consume pills that are definitely meant to invoke drug use. But it was published one month after Kerkerkruip! :) Not sure that we were the first, though; I don't know enough roguelikes to make an educated judgment about that.

One of my aims with Kerkerkruip was to recreate something of the atmosphere of the original sword & sorcery, where sex and drugs, squalor and slavery were as common as you would expect them to be in a world where life is cheap and people live by the sword. Most later fantasy was sanitised (we can blame Tolkien, who, after all, is to blame for almost everything that is bad about modern fantasy), and doubly so in computer games. Ment -- which is obviously a drug and leaves you permanently scarred -- was part of this darker, more realistic aesthetic.

I don't think I was influenced by the Dutch drug laws, no. After all, those only apply to soft drugs, not to anything you would snort, like cocaine. (Unfortunately. While I'm opposed to the use of almost all drugs, I'm even more opposed to the war on drugs, which I believe to be completely counter-productive. Legalise, regulate, discourage -- to me that seems to most pragmatic position.)

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

I have gone through all the items, and improved most of them (see original post for details). I now believe that all items in the game are at least somewhat interesting! If you know stuff that can/should be improved further, we could discuss it in the forum or in a new issue. I'm closing this one.

VictorGijsbers commented 12 years ago

(By the way, I hope you all hate me for adding five new cursed items in the process. ;) )