Open sckott opened 9 years ago
For a reference: http://www.gbif.org/developer/species
There are a lot of things GBIF does that are not in scope and we don't have data for but these are some things others are doing with names.
Right, makes sense. if this is out of scope, no worries
Really, I was implying that GBIF has more/different data than us and some of the functions might not be possible.
I'd like to find some functions that we can do though. A "distinct names from this query" end point seems obvious start.
This would be a great place to start.
i guess this is related to #1
Any news on this?
No movement on a names endpoint per-se, but the beta search api (http://beta-search.idigbio.org/v2/search/records) is currently pointed at a prototype index that has GBIF taxonIDs and canonical names filled out for many of the records (39/56 Million). A combination of GBIF's API and ours would allow you search for a specific taxonID, then search idigbio for that taxon ID.
Ex: Puma concolor http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/match?verbose=true&kingdom=animalia&name=puma%20concolor
TaxonID: 2435099
https://beta-search.idigbio.org/v2/search/records?rq={%22taxonid%22:2435099}
Nice, seems like a useful feature - being able to search for occurrences in idig based on gbif taxon ids
Would be great to have a
/names
endpoint - perhaps with parameters for querying/filtering