Open jakebeal opened 3 years ago
What if we consider that anything (insert, dropout section) between the cloning prefix and suffix is a part. In that case we may not have to distinguish pre and post-construction plasmid and we could just generalize the iGEM registry definition for a plasmid : plasmid = plasmid backone (including prefix and suffix) + part.
Current iGEM registry definiton :
I think this would work for BioBricks, I don't believe it works for GoldenGate, which uses different backbones at different levels.
I'm probably missing something here. Is having different backbones the issue ? Something more general may be : plasmid = backbone (without assembly context) + prefix + part + suffix.
That sounds reasonable to me for BioBricks and GoldenGate, though we definitely need to work the examples.
A proposal for this has been made in: https://github.com/SynBioDex/SEPs/blob/master/sep_055.md
Related to #58, we need to distinguish between a pre-construction plasmid and a post-construction plasmid (e.g., with an insert replacing a dropout section)