iNavFlight / inav

INAV: Navigation-enabled flight control software
https://inavflight.github.io
GNU General Public License v3.0
3.17k stars 1.48k forks source link

Matek F722 STD Baro fail in 3.0 #7163

Closed RipperGOT closed 3 years ago

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

The barometer indicates -44220 in the sensors tab , with previous version does not happen . imagen_2021-06-21_153551

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

@RipperGOT please be more specific, as can not reproduce on 3.0 final and F722-STD

image

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

please be more specific, as can not reproduce on 3.0 final and F722-STD

Sorry, I am new to writing on Github and my english is very poor. What info do you need? When I go from 2.6 to 3.0 (stable) this happens to me with the baro. When I restore to an older firmware (2.6 or 3.0 release candidate) it doesn't happen. I don't have any GPS or MAG connected. Only flash firmware and CLi "defaults" Captura de pantalla 2021-06-21 170038

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

Well, the INAV reports BARO as not working. Check on Confioguration tab, set to AUTO and let firmware to auto detect

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

Well, the INAV reports BARO as not working. Check on Confioguration tab, set to AUTO and let firmware to auto detect

I did try what you told me, but the result is the same. Inav if it recognizes the baro and indicates that it works. But it keeps telling me -44223 ...

I also tried different settings with this, but the problem remains : baro_median_filter = ON baro_cal_tolerance = 150

status

System Uptime: 24 seconds Current Time: 2041-06-28T01:04:00.000+00:00 Voltage: 0.00V (1S battery - NOT PRESENT) CPU Clock=216MHz, GYRO=MPU6500, ACC=MPU6500, BARO=BMP280 STM32 system clocks: SYSCLK = 216 MHz HCLK = 216 MHz PCLK1 = 54 MHz PCLK2 = 108 MHz Sensor status: GYRO=OK, ACC=OK, MAG=NONE, BARO=OK, RANGEFINDER=NONE, OPFLOW=NONE, GPS=NONE SD card: Startup failed Stack size: 6144, Stack address: 0x20010000, Heap available: 2028 I2C Errors: 50, config size: 7195, max available config: 16384 ADC channel usage: BATTERY : configured = ADC 1, used = ADC 1 RSSI : configured = ADC 3, used = none CURRENT : configured = ADC 2, used = ADC 2 AIRSPEED : configured = none, used = none System load: 7, cycle time: 1019, PID rate: 981, RX rate: 49, System rate: 9 Arming disabled flags: ACC RX CLI VTX: not detected

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

3.00-RC2 MatekF722 2021-5-29 Release candidate Firmware Baro works imagen_2021-06-21_190819

DanO83 commented 3 years ago

Same issue here with the Matek F722-WPX, when I flash the F722-PX target or 3.0-RC2 everything is fine. There are more reports of this issue, please look at this facebook post: https://www.facebook.com/groups/INAVFixedWing/permalink/1642063025995489

According to these reports the folowing targets are having the same issue:

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

Please provide full configuration dump with baro working on RC and not working on 3.0-Final.

avsaase commented 3 years ago

I'm not having any issues with the Matek F405-WSE, which uses the same target as the Wing.

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

And on top of that, there are no code changes between RC2 and final that touch on the Baro, sensors or altitude estimation. https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav/compare/3.0.0-RC2...3.0.0-final

@RipperGOT are you flashing with FULL CHIP ERASE ?

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

And on top of that, there are no code changes between RC2 and final that touch on the Baro, sensors or altitude estimation. 3.0.0-RC2...3.0.0-final

@RipperGOT are you flashing with FULL CHIP ERASE ?

Of course friend, i'm flashing with FULL CHIP ERASE. I have tried different ways of flashing, erase, no erase, no reboot ... He left you in this link the 2 Dump files with the 2 versions. In the 2 files only the firmware is flashed, without configuration, only "defaults" after flashing.

https://github.com/RipperGOT/Matek-F722

DanO83 commented 3 years ago

Here are my dumps:

https://github.com/danielolsman/Matek-F722WPX-Baro_fail

only WPX-RC2 and PX-Final targets are working fine on my F722-WPX

DanO83 commented 3 years ago

if I compare my dump files, there isn't much difference that could explain the baro failure, maybe something went wrong with compiling these files???

Jetrell commented 3 years ago

I tested my F722-WPX and got the same results. Barometer checks out fine. But Barometer sensor data is incorrect.

Its related to Blackbox SD data logging.

If the SD card is loaded when the setting files are entered and the blackbox logger is enable in the DUMP / DIFF ALL files.....Or the SD card is not loaded and the BB logging is turned off after a flash/settings load. The problem doesn't appear. But once the logger is turned off or the card ejected; the problem reappears.

I also tested it with an F722-Wing and a F405-WSE and got the same result. While my boards with SPI_FLASH didn't experience this issue. At a guess... It most likely effects all boards with SD loggers.

I had a quick look through what was added in that time frame. I'm not sure how related this could be.. But the FlyWooF745commit on May 28th has - #define ENABLE_BLACKBOX_LOGGING_ON_SDCARD_BY_DEFAULT on the FLYWOOF745NANO target. The GOKU only has SPI_FLASH.

https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav/blob/2df45445874152adf7a80010f8c001e37e474904/src/main/target/FLYWOOF745/target.h

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

@Jetrell I have tested what you indicate and the baro works again on the F722-STD. Great!!!!! No SD, no fly!

MATEKSYS commented 3 years ago

@DzikuVx image

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

So let me get this straight: it happens only on boards with DPS310 , right?

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

BMP280 boards are not affected?

MATEKSYS commented 3 years ago

@DzikuVx This issue happens on BMP280 board also, Tested on F722-SE with BMP280 if no SD card plugged. once SD card is plugged, Baro readout is normal.

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

Any chance those baros on those boards are SPI connected @MATEKSYS ?

MATEKSYS commented 3 years ago

All are on I2C bus @DzikuVx , but I noticed the barometer works normal on F765-WING because of different firmware version.

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

OK, I think I have a fix. But this actually is a bad news from the technical point of view as it means scheduler is overstressed

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

OK, looks like I have found a solution to the problem. The key information was that it's happening only without an SD card.

below are hexes for some of the boards, please tests and test also:

inav_3.0.0_MATEKF722.hex.zip inav_3.0.0_MATEKF405.hex.zip inav_3.0.0_MATEKF405SE.hex.zip inav_3.0.0_MATEKF722SE.hex.zip inav_3.0.0_MATEKF722PX.hex.zip

digitalentity commented 3 years ago

Can we get output of tasks command while the baro is faling vs when the baro is working?

RipperGOT commented 3 years ago

@DzikuVx Works!!! Great job friend, I love you!!!! Baro readings are correct with and without SD on the F722-STD.

DzikuVx commented 3 years ago

@RipperGOT SD card tests are required since the reason was a timing clash with SD card processing

Jetrell commented 3 years ago

@DzikuVx Also tested, using F722SE (BMP280) and F405SE (DPS310). Both use SD cards and work correctly now.

MATEKSYS commented 3 years ago

@digitalentity QQ截图20210625190604 QQ截图20210625190746

digitalentity commented 3 years ago

Thanks @MATEKSYS. I've already found the problem:

Our boot sequence looks like this:

  1. Basic HW boot
  2. Sensor detection
  3. baroStartCalibration is called
  4. Scheduler kicks in and starts calling the tasks
  5. ...
  6. Barometer task is called, acquires the first sample and finishes the calibration immediately ending up with a wrong offset due to transient processes in the chip.

This happens because our zeroCalibration[.+] code measures the calibration time from when the calibration was started, not from when the first sample was acquired, we just never expected the interval between steps (3) and (7) to take over 2 seconds (barometer calibration time).

I'm working on a change to our zero calibration code to fix the issue.

In the meanwhile 3.0 should be safe to fly, because the wrong calibration is not causing the barometer to be non-functional and the navigation code will account for the offset at the moment of fisrt arming.

digitalentity commented 3 years ago

Should be fixed now

A2BELE commented 3 years ago

Hi all, I’ve also been having this issue. Everyone kept trying to say it was foam over the baro.

Anyway the hex file from online with inav configuration is different to the hex file you download to pc.

the one you download is stable , although I still have shoot to the moon events.

F722se.

also posted on Facebook

digitalentity commented 3 years ago

Tested and working properly. Closing.