Closed amtoine closed 1 year ago
About the names/colors I would suggest:
log_ok
-->log_info
log_info
-->log_ok
[-]
is the realerror
I think thinking I just wrongly use[!]
once or twice, could you replace every[!]
(currentlylog_error
) by[-]
and renamelog_normal
-->log_error
(using red then)don't think it's crystal clear sorry about that!
i'm not 100% sure, but tell me if what i've tried below is fine :yum: see
cc054bb^..2d337af
composed ofcc054bb
and2d337af
if that's what you meant, i'll push these two commits on the PR branch :wink:
if that's what you meant, i'll push these two commits on the PR branch
Actually almost!
I'd just invert the colors of log_info
and log_ok
(to have [i]
==info in purple and [+]
==ok in green) but yours seems fine too.
Actually almost! I'd just invert the colors of
log_info
andlog_ok
(to have[i]
==info in purple and[+]
==ok in green) but yours seems fine too.like this? :smirk: see 83f045d
@amtoine looks perfect!
I understand your workflow of pushing these changes on a test/*
branch until you know they are validated but it can be a little confusing while testing (fetching the PR branch isn't enough I have to remember to fetch the amtoine test/*
branch).
A PR branch is a already a construction branch, no worries if you sometime have to revert commits or override some previous changes (like in this case), could you avoid doing this for the future review? :confused:
Apart from this I think your PR is ready to be merged :wink:
I understand your workflow of pushing these changes on a
test/*
branch until you know they are validated but it can be a little confusing while testing (fetching the PR branch isn't enough I have to remember to fetch theamtoine test/*
branch). A PR branch is a already a construction branch, no worries if you sometime have to revert commits or override some previous changes (like in this case), could you avoid doing this for the future review? confusedgot it :ok_hand: i sometimes branch early and often, feel free to not fetch these branches and ask me to push on the PR branch directly :wink:
Apart from this I think your PR is ready to be merged wink
great :muscle: @atxr? :yum:
I understand your workflow of pushing these changes on a
test/*
branch until you know they are validated but it can be a little confusing while testing (fetching the PR branch isn't enough I have to remember to fetch theamtoine test/*
branch). A PR branch is a already a construction branch, no worries if you sometime have to revert commits or override some previous changes (like in this case), could you avoid doing this for the future review? confusedgot it :ok_hand: i sometimes branch early and often, feel free to not fetch these branches and ask me to push on the PR branch directly :wink:
Apart from this I think your PR is ready to be merged wink
great :muscle: @atxr? :yum:
I'll check within the week!
@amtoine I think the chnages we discussed are still on your test/*
branch, could you rebase them onto this PR branch? :yum:
@amtoine I think the chnages we discussed are still on your
test/*
branch, could you rebase them onto this PR branch? yumwoooopsie, yep :eyes:
@ctmbl @atxr that should do it, sorry for the back-and-forth :grimacing:
This PR
log_*
tool functions to wrap theecho "[.] ..."
in an easier to modify frameworkecho "[.] ..."
by their appropriatelog_* "..."
counterpartthings to pay attention to
[.]
in the script, i've come up with the following transition tablelog_error
log_ok
log_warning
log_hint
log_info
log_normal
:point_right: i'm not sure about the exact names and the colors...
:pray: please tell me if any of them should change!!