The histogram figures as outputted now are very good. However, some users may want a more conventional histogram that does not distinguish between inter-species and inter-genus (traditionally, both of these distances are just subsumed as "inter-species".
Please implement three additional histograms that would be totally equivalent to the ones we have now, but that do not show "inter-genus". Instead, for these histograms, all "inter-species" and "inter-genus" values are considered to belong to the "inter-species" category and all shown in dark blue colour.
So we would have only two categories:
intra-species (red in the stacked and dodged histograms)
inter-species (all values from inter-species and inter-genus) (dark blue in the stacked and dodged histograms).
The histogram figures as outputted now are very good. However, some users may want a more conventional histogram that does not distinguish between inter-species and inter-genus (traditionally, both of these distances are just subsumed as "inter-species".
Please implement three additional histograms that would be totally equivalent to the ones we have now, but that do not show "inter-genus". Instead, for these histograms, all "inter-species" and "inter-genus" values are considered to belong to the "inter-species" category and all shown in dark blue colour.
So we would have only two categories: intra-species (red in the stacked and dodged histograms) inter-species (all values from inter-species and inter-genus) (dark blue in the stacked and dodged histograms).