iXit / wine-nine-standalone

Build Gallium Nine support on top of an existing WINE installation
GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
272 stars 23 forks source link

Follow Wine's libdir structure #158

Open 9ary opened 1 year ago

9ary commented 1 year ago

Continuation of #154. I really would like for this to be merged in some form, so input on what direction to take it would be very valuable.

dhewg commented 1 year ago

Time is sparse, I'll poke at it next week to see if a build time switch looks a bit nicer!

EliasTheGrandMasterOfMistakes commented 7 months ago

this will be merged a day??? or gallium nine standalone is abandoned ?

9ary commented 7 months ago

I don't know, but I'm personally not interested in working on these patches anymore. If anyone wants to pick this up, as well as #155, and move things forward, they're welcome to.

That said, this PR in particular makes no functional changes, it's only to make life easier for distro maintainers. This repo is only a thin wrapper around the d3d9 implementation in mesa, which is maintained. There's little that ever needs to change in here, other than adapting to breaking changes in wine (the upcoming wayland support is one such change; gallium nine will continue to work, but only on X11 or xwayland as is currently the case).
A project being inactive does not mean it should be considered dead or abandoned.

EliasTheGrandMasterOfMistakes commented 7 months ago

I don't know, but I'm personally not interested in working on these patches anymore. If anyone wants to pick this up, as well as #155, and move things forward, they're welcome to.

That said, this PR in particular makes no functional changes, it's only to make life easier for distro maintainers. This repo is only a thin wrapper around the d3d9 implementation in mesa, which is maintained. There's little that ever needs to change in here, other than adapting to breaking changes in wine (the upcoming wayland support is one such change; gallium nine will continue to work, but only on X11 or xwayland as is currently the case). A project being inactive does not mean it should be considered dead or abandoned.

thanks, sorry for my confusion.