MobileNetv3 applies k*k depthwise conv for each bottleneck, but GhostNet dose not. Dose the d*d cheap op work like k*k depthwise conv for extending receptive field?
You're right. d*d cheap op can not only generate ghost feature maps, but also extend receptive field that works like k*k depthwise conv in MobileNetV3 bottleneck.
MobileNetv3 applies
k*k
depthwise conv for each bottleneck, but GhostNet dose not. Dose thed*d
cheap op work likek*k
depthwise conv for extending receptive field?