Closed fuchun-wang closed 2 years ago
Thank you for being so interested in our paper. Right after I read your issue, I newly cloned the original github repo of ZeroQ and ran it again. The result is shown below, that of ResNet-18/w4a4, which records 21.79% of top-1 accuracy. Would you elaborate your test environment?
@iamkanghyunchoi I'm so sorry, I forgot to change something. Thank u for your quick reply. Sorry again.
The problem seems to be related to activation bit setting. Would you check the activation bit again?
EDIT : Oh, you fixed it. Thank you again for paying attention to our paper!
Yes! You can just close this 'stupid' issue. Sorry for wasting your precious time.
When i played with ZeroQ codes. I was very surprised to find that the results for ZeroQ/Resnet-18/w4a4/ in Table 1 of the paper are very low, 22.58%. But when I tried to run the official ZeroQ code, the result was 47.96%. Result for w5a5 setting is 68.26 % compared to 59.6 in the paper.
By the way, your work is solid and impressive!!!