I am unsure if this was intended behavior, but I am unable to currently run 'LeetCodeTest' and get a 'Run Code' / 'test' submission. I am only able to run 'LeetCodeSubmit' and get back some output. After a while, I noticed the output was missing std_output for debugging. I found in the code that we chose to branch on judge_type == 'large'... I am thinking it would be better to branch on submission_id since they are uniquely formatted between Submit and Run Code.
Maybe someone can help me get my LeetCodeTest to run correctly?
INPUT:
impl Solution {
pub fn two_sum(nums: Vec<i32>, target: i32) -> Vec<i32> {
println!("nums: {:?}", nums);
println!("target: {}", target);
for x in 0..nums.len() {
println!("{}", x)
}
vec![0, 23333]
}
}
Example output after proposed change of LeetCodeSubmit
# Two Sum
## State
- Wrong Answer
## Runtime
- N/A
## Test Cases
- Passed: 0
- Total: 29
- WARNING: some test cases failed
## Standard Output
nums: [2, 7, 11, 15]
target: 9
0
1
2
3
### Input
[2,7,11,15]
9
### Actual Answer
[0,23333]
### Expected Answer
[0,1]
I am unsure if this was intended behavior, but I am unable to currently run 'LeetCodeTest' and get a 'Run Code' / 'test' submission. I am only able to run 'LeetCodeSubmit' and get back some output. After a while, I noticed the output was missing std_output for debugging. I found in the code that we chose to branch on judge_type == 'large'... I am thinking it would be better to branch on submission_id since they are uniquely formatted between Submit and Run Code.
Maybe someone can help me get my LeetCodeTest to run correctly?
INPUT:
Example output after proposed change of LeetCodeSubmit