Open harriha opened 8 years ago
This project nicely lists dual-licensed packages under both categories in the detailed summary view, all good there. However, it would be nice if there was a cross-reference to the other license(s) in these cases, something along the lines
├─┬ GPL │ ├── case@1.4.1 [additional license(s): MIT]
Thoughts? Or am I trying to make my life a bit too easy perhaps :)?
This project nicely lists dual-licensed packages under both categories in the detailed summary view, all good there. However, it would be nice if there was a cross-reference to the other license(s) in these cases, something along the lines
Thoughts? Or am I trying to make my life a bit too easy perhaps :)?