Closed aandvalenzuela closed 1 year ago
@aandvalenzuela could you please check if packages in backports
are already in 0.19?
@iarspider is there any reason why branch CMSSW_12_6_X
does not share the git history with branch CMSSW_12_5_pre4
?
I wanted to keep history clean
@aandvalenzuela could you please check if packages in
backports
are already in 0.19?
They are not, I'd say: https://github.com/iarspider/cms-spack-repo/tree/CMSSW_13_0_X/repos/backports/packages Backported packages are:
benchmark
(upstream: https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/benchmark/package.py), igprof
(https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/igprof/package.py), professor
(https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/professor/package.py),rapidjson
(https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/rapidjson/package.py).Many thanks @iarspider!
Can you try porting this to 13_0_X branch? I want to setup an IB using that branch before X-mas
Yes, I will try. I think it can take some time due to uncommon histories. CMSSW_13_0_X
doesn't build for me, is it for you?
Everything except cmssw should build
cmssw is outdated, you can add any recent (e.g. today's) tag in there. Just keep the placeholder line.
This PR includes
aarch64
andpcc64le
archs in the recipes. I have kept compiler definition foramd64
, but it needs to be modified for testing to the corresponding compiler. Aside, this PR also removes padding in the installation path.