Open raphaelchenouard opened 3 years ago
I cant' reproduce the issue with ibexsolve. I run it 10 times and obtain each time
solution n°1 = ([0, 6] ; [0, 5])
What did you execute precisely?
With ibexopt, you have to turn off inhc4 but the flag is missing for the exectutable unfortunately. I'm adding it.
I tested with 2.8.9 and current dev (2.8.9.1) using soplex and I get:
$ ibexsolve pl.mbx --trace
***************************** setup *****************************
file loaded: pl.mbx
output file: pl.cov
trace: ON
*****************************************************************
running............
[solution] ([0, 6] ; [0, 5])
solving successful!
number of solution boxes: 1
number of boundary boxes: --
number of unknown boxes: --
number of pending boxes: --
cpu time used: 0.00065s
number of cells: 1
results written in pl.cov
Or
$ ibexsolve pl.mbx --trace
***************************** setup *****************************
file loaded: pl.mbx
output file: pl.cov
trace: ON
*****************************************************************
running............
infeasible problem
number of solution boxes: --
number of boundary boxes: --
number of unknown boxes: --
number of pending boxes: --
cpu time used: 0.00055s
number of cells: 1
results written in pl.cov
Or
$ ibexsolve pl.mbx --trace
***************************** setup *****************************
file loaded: pl.mbx
output file: pl.cov
trace: ON
*****************************************************************
running............
[solution] ([0, 0.5467500000000002] ; [0, 1.012500000000001])
[solution] ([0.5467500000000001, 1.215000000000001] ; [0, 1.012500000000001])
[solution] ([0, 1.215000000000001] ; [1.0125, 2.250000000000001])
[solution] ([2.7, 3.368250000000001] ; [0, 0.9213750000000004])
[solution] ([3.36825, 4.185000000000001] ; [0, 0.4146187500000003])
[solution] ([3.36825, 4.185000000000001] ; [0.4146187500000002, 0.9213750000000004])
[solution] ([2.7, 3.368250000000001] ; [0.9213750000000003, 2.047500000000001])
[solution] ([3.36825, 4.185000000000001] ; [0.9213750000000003, 2.047500000000001])
[solution] ([4.185, 6] ; [0, 2.047500000000001])
solving successful!
number of solution boxes: 9
number of boundary boxes: --
number of unknown boxes: --
number of pending boxes: --
cpu time used: 0.002477s
number of cells: 23
results written in pl.cov
I've made a fix on ibexsolve. Can you try again? Now I obtain plenty of boundary boxes, which is the normal behavior.
For ibexopt, I remember now that inhc4 is already automatically turned off when it can't be applied. When I run your problem with a goal, I just have the warning:
warning: inHC4 disabled (unimplemented operator)
and the optimization runs well. I am surprised by this old error message.
Note: inhc4 is not used in ibexsolve.
I conform that ibexsolve works normally now. For ibexopt I have to clean and build again since i face the same error message with inner projection of mul_VV and I have no warning about inHC4 being disabled.
Ok let me know.
I use this model:
Constants
N=2;
M=3;
c[1][N] = (-2,-3);
A[M][N] = ((1,6);(2,2);(4,1));
b[M] = (30;15;24);
Variables
x[N] in [0,oo];
Minimize c*x;
Constraints
A*x<=b;
End
And I stil get this error latest dev branch:
$ ~/lib/ibex-lib/build/bin/ibexopt pl.mbx
************************ setup ************************
file loaded: pl.mbx
output COV file: pl.cov
*******************************************************
running............
***********************************************************************
IBEX has crashed because the following feature is not implemented yet:
Inner projection of "mul_VV"
Please, submit a new feature request.
***********************************************************************
When using vector or matrices in the modelling, ibex does not make relevant computations. Modeling a linear system like the following one:
gives errors in the results and different results depending on the run. I get a few several solutions or 1 solution or infeasible problem! I formulate the same problem without vector expression and it works well.
Using ibexopt adding an objective function, we get an error message about mul_VV contractor not yet implemented. Maybe the same kind of message should be thrown for ibexsolve: