Closed Stoyz closed 5 months ago
@Stoyz I think you are pointing about below change in PR:
This change has fixed a bug in the queryResult() API. await result= conn.queryResult()
do not return outparams
for Stored Procedure call with OUTPUT or INOUT type of parameters, when async-await programming is used. So, we are resolving the promise as an array and data can be extracted from the array by application. We found this bug in the code while fixing other issues. So, the change is intentional as a bug fix. Hope, it clarifies. Thanks.
Thank you for the clarification @bimalkjha
Only thing, in my opinion, this change should've been marked as breaking because it broke my code and there was no mention about this.
@Stoyz I agree, but I am not sure about how to mark about it. Could you please help me with your suggestion about the steps or place to mention about it? We'll try to follow it. Thanks.
@bimalkjha sure thing.
In my opinion and in the majority of libraries, a common place where to tell a user if a change is breaking or not is in the changelog file. In your case the file is CHANGES.md in which you can just write in parenthesis that a change is breaking.
Follows an example of a breaking change in markdown:
* (__breaking__) change: some thing has changed in issue https://github.com/ibmdb/node-ibm_db/issues/960
In addition to this, when there is a breaking change a major release should occur if you follow the Semantic Versioning guidelines.
Hope to have been helpful.
Thanks @Stoyz . Will update Changes.md in future breaking changes accordingly and do major release. Thanks.
Hello, I am opening this issue to ask a question about the PR #953 (merged and published in version 3.2.3) which changes the deferred resolve of the
queryResult
function to an array as you can see in this comparison.Has the change been intentional? If so, do you mind if I ask why the change has not been marked as breaking change?
I have a piece of code which does not work anymore due to the change and I had to take the first value of the array in order to use the
getAffectedRowsSync
function.Follows a portion of the code I am now using:
Thank you.