Closed jweisz closed 7 months ago
Working on updating the .json now. Question for this one though: the new proper name for conversation is "watsonx Assistant" so should our naming reflect that? watsonx_assistant
Actually in thinking this through a bit more, I take that back because there are two recipes we could go with for assistant:
So maybe watsonx_assistant
for 1, then conversation_assistant
for 2?
Hm, good question. I guess the way I thought about it was the way you described above:
.json
file is still valid, although I think I did do some fixup at one point (e.g. to remove functionality we no longer have)If I had to prioritize, 1 is at the top of my list. :)
Technically this issue should probably be closed given that we did already rename the receipts (in dev
): (1) corresponds to conversation_watsonx
and (2) corresponds to conversation_assistant
. And I think we have other issues for actually implementing these recipes? I'll let you decide @modcarroll :D
Aha! You're right about dev - I completely forgot about that. Ok perfect
The existing
conversation
recipe uses Watson Assistant, but WA has likely changed a lot since we wrote the recipe (there's a new thing called "Actions" now?), so the proposal is to:conversation-assistant
).json
file that serialized all our conversational intents will work with the new WA? This needs to be tested. 😄