Open dsschult opened 2 years ago
This code hasn't changed in years, and given that it builds with g++ 4.8.5, I think it's more likely that whatever this compiler is it doesn't fully implement this gcc extension.
Looks like an intel compiler. Also note I'm just reporting this from another person we're working with at TACC.
From a test on an (older) custom compiler on a supercomputer. Apparently there is no test in cmake, but the code requires c++17.