发现两个 Bug

[Ming-Y-ANG]

1. bertlv_tag_make 函数中第一个判断 num < 0x7f 是不是应该是 num < 0x1f 才对?，低标签编码的 num 范围应该是 0-30?

2. 在 1 的基础上我修改为 num < 0x1f, 执行下面的测试程序，发现像 256, 512 这种数 bertlv_tag_get_number 有问题？

   int main(int argc, char **argv)
   { 
       int num, tag;
   
       num = 30;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 31;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 32;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 64;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 128;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 255;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 256;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 257;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
       num = 512;
       tag = bertlv_tag_make(BERTLV_CLASS_APPLICATION, BERTLV_TYPE_PRIMITIVE, num);
       printf("num: %d, tag: %x, num: %ld\n", num, tag, bertlv_tag_get_number(tag));
   
       return 0;
   }
   num: 30, tag: 5e, num: 30
   num: 31, tag: 5f1f, num: 31
   num: 32, tag: 5f20, num: 32
   num: 64, tag: 5f40, num: 64
   num: 128, tag: 5f8180, num: 128
   num: 255, tag: 5f81ff, num: 255
   num: 256, tag: 5f8200, num: 0
   num: 257, tag: 5f8201, num: 257
   num: 512, tag: 5f8400, num: 0

[iceignatius]

感謝您的回報，現已修正這個問題。