search

ices-eg / DIG

ICES Data and Information Group
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
3 stars 1 forks source link

Review Challenges and opportunities identified by DIG #465

Open sjurl opened 1 year ago

sjurl commented 1 year ago

Lead: Sjur Members: Oliver, Jens, David, Ingeborg

sjurl commented 1 year ago

To be performed when #463 and #464 has been finalized

sjurl commented 1 year ago

https://github.com/ices-eg/DIG/issues/117 - to be discussed as part of review

sjurl commented 1 year ago

https://github.com/ices-eg/DIG/issues/464 updates to how review should be performed

neil-ices-dk commented 5 months ago

Sub-group (22nd May 2024)

Review the usability of the board itself

There is a use case for the 'board' view and 'list' view. One immediate improvement was to add a 'slicer' to the board view which allows you to easily filter by challenge, opportunity, severity etc.

Review the rationale for the assignment of scores for challenges and opportunities

background to criteria and orginal setup (DIG, 2019 and 2018) 2019 ICES (2019). Report of the Data and Information Group (DIG). ICES Committee and Delegate meeting reports (until 2020). Report. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8391 2018 ICES (2018). Report of the Data and Information Group (DIG). ICES Committee and Delegate meeting reports (until 2020). Report. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8362

Sub-group recommend to (1) publish the 2018 rationale to a stand alone (and accessible) guidance document for future reference. (2) update and change the 2018 rationale to sharpen and clarify

Matrix Heading Explanation
Priority Topic Which of the three priority topics the line is relating to. As far as possible, this will be constrained to one topic, but there will be issues that clearly span across multiple topics.
Concept Description The main concept/capability that is being addressed.
Challenges Challenges associated with the concept (if any).
Opportunities Opportunities associated with the concept (if any).
Existing Activities Current or ongoing ICES activities that are of direct relevant to the concept
Recommendations and actions More regularly updated section clarifying who is monitoring or carrying out any actions relating to this concept.
Likelihood A simple 1 – 3 score that demonstrates the expected likelihood of this concept having an effect on ICES work. Where 1 = Long term (5+ years), 2 = Medium term (3-5 years), and 3 = Short term (within the next  1-2 years).
Impact A broad descriptor of the perceived impact of the concept directly on ICES Data Centre and services. 3 = Complete rebuild of existing service or need to bring in new expertise, 2 = Substantial re-engineering of existing solutions, or need to consult external expertise as part of projects, 1 = Some changes likely, but mainly in demand or smaller tweaks to existing solutions.
Change Score Product of Likelihood x Impact. So a score from 1-9. 1-2 considered low effect, 3-4 medium and 6-9 high effect. DIG will review and update these scores and raise issues that are escalating in risk or reward. It should be stressed that the scores reflect potential for both positive and negative effects. The higher the score, the bigger the change and potential work required.

Review current list for consistency

Ollie walked through the review that the sub-group had done and the evaluation of the challenge/opportunity in terms of the impact/severity and likelihood. Agree that this was a good exercise and the sub-group have done a good job.

Review the shortlist of potential additions to the tracker based on Dave's sub-group work

https://github.com/ices-eg/DIG/issues/600#issuecomment-2024839642 This sub-group decided that this will need to wait until the guidance is clarified and published to ensure we evaluate these potential challenges/opportunities in an even and consistent way