Open odontaster opened 1 year ago
I would have a couple of suggestions to be discussed:
To also address
Subgroup met last month, find minutes here: https://community.ices.dk/ExpertGroups/WGAcousticGov/2023%20Meeting%20Documents/04.%20Working%20documents/Biotic%20format%20subgroup
Next steps, as suggested by Susan:
Maybe we now need to digest a little and then try to divide them into:
-those that can be solved in the DB (without breaking good DB practice such as not storing derived data in the db)
-those that can be solved between Db and Stox (or in StoX) Here I am thinking of the mean weight at length issue for one – adding a building block in the StoX library for calculating “individual weights” from total weight of length class could potentially be better than uploading the calculated mean weight for unweighed fish in the biology section of DB.
-Those that will have to be solved by changing practice at the institutes (or continue manipulating data to fit the further workflow in Db and StoX).
Subgroup met again in late November 2023. Main points:
Next steps:
ICES secretariat team need some time for this, probably to be presented in WGACOUSTIC 2024 Q2 at least.
I am working on the review of the documentation. Intersessionally I will ask the feedback of the biotic subgroup if that is ok, so we have something ready for approval or review by the whole group for the Q2 meeting.
Will be process in Q3
Please review and comment the format file and the extract of the documentation here: https://community.ices.dk/ExpertGroups/WGAcousticGov/2024%20Meeting%20Documents/04.%20Working%20documents/Biotic%20format%20and%20examples%20work
@SMLusseau
@arnejohannesholmin
Please comment on the files by 07.10.2024!!! (Hjalte, this is seventh of the October) https://community.ices.dk/ExpertGroups/WGAcousticGov/2024%20Meeting%20Documents/04.%20Working%20documents/Biotic%20format%20and%20examples%20work
I have been looking at the way the Biotic files are submitted and reduced the submissions to two main types: