HjalteParner
commented
3 weeks ago 108 889 catch records where species category number, subsample number and subsample factor are reported.
30 463 catch records of above where ABS([SubsampledNumber] [SubsamplingFactor] - [SpeciesCategoryNumber]) > 1 i.e. SELECT [Cruise].[LocalID], [SpeciesCategoryNumber], [SubsampledNumber], [SubsamplingFactor], [SubsampledNumber][SubsamplingFactor] AS 'SpeciesCategoryNumberCalculated' FROM [Catch] INNER JOIN [Haul] ON [Catch].[HaulID] = [Haul].[ID] INNER JOIN [Cruise] ON [Haul].[CruiseID] = [Cruise].[ID] WHERE [SpeciesCategoryNumber] IS NOT NULL AND [SubsampledNumber] IS NOT NULL AND [SubsamplingFactor] IS NOT NULL AND ABS([SubsampledNumber] * [SubsamplingFactor] - [SpeciesCategoryNumber]) > 1
76 cruise records where ABS([SubsampledNumber] [SubsamplingFactor] - [SpeciesCategoryNumber]) > 1 i.e. SELECT DISTINCT [Cruise].[LocalID] FROM [Catch] INNER JOIN [Haul] ON [Catch].[HaulID] = [Haul].[ID] INNER JOIN [Cruise] ON [Haul].[CruiseID] = [Cruise].[ID] WHERE [SpeciesCategoryNumber] IS NOT NULL AND [SubsampledNumber] IS NOT NULL AND [SubsamplingFactor] IS NOT NULL AND ABS([SubsampledNumber] [SubsamplingFactor] - [SpeciesCategoryNumber]) > 1
Of the 30 463 catch records some are clearly have the wrong numbers while others also being wrong seems to be misunderstandings of the format.
Please see extract attached
If species category number, subsample number and subsample factor are reported, then species category number = susbample number * subsample factor should be the same.