Closed cedricbriandgithub closed 2 years ago
Year | EMU-Eide | Comment |
---|---|---|
2000 | 8.0 | |
2001 | 8.4 | |
2002 | 7.1 | |
2003 | 7.0 | |
2004 | 7.5 | |
2005 | 6.2 | |
2006 | 5.6 | |
2007 | 4.3 | |
2008 | 2.0 | Only coastal waters. No data from F and T |
2009 | 1.2 | |
2010 | 1.6 | |
2011 | 1.4 | |
2012 | 1.0 | |
2013 | 0.9 | |
2014 | 1.0 | |
2015 | 0.7 | |
2016 | 0.6 |
*FIXED: this issue was solved when Lasse provided a corrected table, but it was just after the production of the CR
2) Aquaculture Table 8. Your table contained only the eels produced for stocking. Not those produced for consumption.
Year | YS + OG | YS | OG | Sum | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 774 | 774 | |||
2008 | 749 | 749.4 | |||
2009 | 667 | 667 | |||
2010 | 681 | 681 | |||
2011 | 692 | 692 | |||
2012 | 744 | 744 | |||
2013 | 758 | 758 | |||
2014 | 926 | 926 | |||
2015 | 1147 | 29 | 1176 | ||
2016 | 1061 | 38 | 1099 | ||
2017 | 1073 | 38 | 1111 | ||
2018 | 1095 | 38 | 1132 | ||
2019 | 1255 | 30 | 1285 | provisional data |
Fixed with commit 9fd6e3cc2e603657c561f1781658f55e46234135
for yellow standing stock we have two series OriY aand AlCY. However, there is only a figure for OriY and in the Figure description it says recruitment Y, while it is standing stock data.
personal note Also the trend is linear, and shoud be a gam => fixed
There are missing recreational landings for 2016 2018 for some reason they were not on the sharepoint The right version of the file is Eel_Data_Call_2020_Annex5_Landings_Recreational_FI_RIGHT_VERSION.xlsx On the sharepoint
OK fixed
Several comments on Scotland's data in the automated country report export on the sharepoint......
For a number of your tables - not just thew one Alan spotted - the 2020 value for Scotland is given as "." In all cases it should be "0"
In general it is hard for me to tell some of the colours apart on the figures, so it's difficult to be sure the data look right.
Map for yellow eel standing stock and silver eel escapement sites doesn't really work for Scotland as both yellow and silver are reported for all three sites - but you can't tell that from the map - looks like there's only silver eel data.
Finally and most importantly, I sent you the 2020 data for the yellow eel recruitment series at the Girnock (GirnY) on the 15th Sept - need to be integrated : see below
GirN for 2020 - very poor year indeed at this site! - as follows:
new_data tab, ser_nameshort = GirnY, das_year = 2020, das_value = 53 OK new_biometry tab, ser_nameshort = GirnY, bio_year = 2020, bio_length = 151.0, bio_weight = 4.11
NOT DONE THIS YEAR SORRY NO TIME
These data are correct to 14/09/2020 and the trap will operate until 30/09/2020 - and thus the data have to be regarded as Provisional even though there are very unlikely to be any further recruits.
Use new shiny data edition tool to update this
01:07 01:01 00:01 01:05
DONE yellow series: 2 values updated in the db and 8 new values inserted in the database silver eel series: 2.1-- 2 new values inserted in the database 2.3-- 8 new values inserted in the database 2.5 --5 new values inserted in the database
In the autamated CR for landings yellow eels and silver for 2019 some strage numbers appears. Shoul be 0 – we report only for combined YS stage > Done: Data present in the files of the 2020 Data Call and modify (qual_id=20 assigned to Y and S data in 2019 Freshwater EMU: Oder and Vist , and new data inserted for YS 2019 Freshwater EMU: Oder and Vist Also aquaculture data is missing > fixed
LV
yellow and silver series the format was wrong... Janis only sent the update today and I had forgeten that I ever asked :-o Need to be integrated. New file CORRECTED in LV on the sharepoint 00:01
01:07 01:01 00:01 01:05
yellow series: 2 values updated in the db and 8 new values inserted in the database
I think all the data are there and correct, but there are some duplications between tables 1, 2 and 3 – are these ok?
Some of the numbers in the releases are rounded up, where others are given to 2 decimal places – why the inconsistency.
I have the end of year recruitment data for all Irish traps now, I guess I don’t include it now at this late stage, just update in 2021?
they give two times the same information. One time in the updated_data sheet where they put the value for YS life stage and a second time in the new data where for the same year they put value for Y and S life stage and if you look closely YS (updated data)=Y (new_data)+S (new data). That's why Lithuanian landing data looked like doubled since 2000
Correction need to be done with Arvydas
sweden
Seems some data are missing compared to what Josefin has sent in.
I also wonder about the unit for releases in number, the graph says millions, but that we as an example released 60 million eels in 1977 and that as yellows in inland waters seems totally weird. The corresponding weight in 1977 was 47,6 ton and that doesn’t fit as the yellows at that time was about 80 grams each.
When SE doesn’t distinguish between yellows and silvers as most anyhow are silver eels, is then/should then the catch of yellow be a 0 or an empty cell? This refers to Table 1 where both 0 and dots occur.
If silver eels aren’t caught at our West coast (or the few there must have been weren’t distinguished from the bulk of yellows), is then the catch 0 or a dot? Refers to Table 2.
The same table is missing data for 2019 that we must have reported.
Table 3 and 4. Sweden has decided there are no recreational catches as only professional eel fisheries are allowed (simple solution by the government!). Is then the catch consistently a 0 or a dot?
The release issues again. When you state e.g. 60 as a number for year 1977 in both Table 5 and the corresponding graph, is that really in millions?
If so, how could we come to that extremely high figure? In that very case it corresponds to ca 47,6 ton of yellows in inland waters. They were about 11 in a kg, so a more reasonable figure would be ca 524 000 eels.
Also in these tables there is a mix of 0 and dots.
As we think we knows what was released every year, I assume a 0 would be the right choice to be used instead of dots.
There were nothing on Aquaculture, but I am sure you got those data.
Figure 14, aren’t two dots missing (the YFS’s)?