Just following up on my comment regarding the standard graphs and the discrepancy between what the confidence intervals on the advice sheets are labelled as and what they are labelled as on the public standard graphs page. See the image below from ( https://standardgraphs.ices.dk/ViewCharts.aspx?key=17000)
The graphs are labelled correctly as 90% CI but the table with the data says 95%. I've noticed this in other stocks including western horse mackerel too. I assume its some simple glitch but worth following up on as it could cause confusion with public accessing the data. Also on the shiny advice app they are labelled as 2*SD in the F and SSB plots, and are not labelled in the recruitment plot. So maybe these should be changed to match the advice sheets or vice versa.
Just following up on my comment regarding the standard graphs and the discrepancy between what the confidence intervals on the advice sheets are labelled as and what they are labelled as on the public standard graphs page. See the image below from ( https://standardgraphs.ices.dk/ViewCharts.aspx?key=17000)
The graphs are labelled correctly as 90% CI but the table with the data says 95%. I've noticed this in other stocks including western horse mackerel too. I assume its some simple glitch but worth following up on as it could cause confusion with public accessing the data. Also on the shiny advice app they are labelled as 2*SD in the F and SSB plots, and are not labelled in the recruitment plot. So maybe these should be changed to match the advice sheets or vice versa.