I think it would be good to have the types for strict Text and ByteString available all the time.
I don't think it's a problem that there is also lazy variants of these, because I feel that if you're using those then you probably should qualify them (e.g. Lazy.Text / Lazy.ByteString or similar)
Potentially having NonEmpty, Set, Map, HashSet and HashMap would be nice too.
I think it would be good to have the types for strict
Text
andByteString
available all the time.I don't think it's a problem that there is also lazy variants of these, because I feel that if you're using those then you probably should qualify them (e.g.
Lazy.Text
/Lazy.ByteString
or similar)Potentially having
NonEmpty
,Set
,Map
,HashSet
andHashMap
would be nice too.